# AFS Silk V2 Teaser!

**URL:** <https://forum.progressionproject.com/t/afs-silk-v2-teaser/14413>\
**Category:** Foils and Boards - Gear Talk\
**Created:** [March 1, 2026, 2:16am UTC](https://forum.progressionproject.com/t/afs-silk-v2-teaser/14413 "2026-03-01T02:16:35Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 46

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Matt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a6a055/32.png) [@Matt](https://forum.progressionproject.com/u/Matt)\
**Post date:** [March 17, 2026, 4:03pm UTC](https://forum.progressionproject.com/t/afs-silk-v2-teaser/14413/46 "2026-03-17T16:03:26Z")

</div>

it looks really good, like that the dihedral is still there, and the look is aggressive and smooth. Tips also look nicely cleaned up and the sweep looks really good. I feel like they went aggresive on the curves while tweaking the section to get some pump which is cool. I was worried it would be all curve reduction and no change to section

> [@theliftjournal](#):
>
> My personal preference is I like a little bit of a slower tail

Me too, I really like the [chopped 132 tail](https://forum.progressionproject.com/t/afs-ha38-tail-chop/10699/18). I would go smaller still and when it warms up will be reducing a HA38 tail down to the same AR as the chopped 132

I think both the silks and the enduros benefit from the smaller slower tails for prone, the 142 is too big and I’m not surprised Dylan felt it too draggy for the higher speed riding. The thing I’m after is also quite specific ([small wave](https://www.youtube.com/shorts/m_0yS2qptyA) pockety foam attempts) which I’m super excited for the new foils for this, as well as downwind.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.progressionproject.com/t/afs-silk-v2-teaser/14413)._
