# New Code Surf Wings - 810x

**URL:** <https://forum.progressionproject.com/t/new-code-surf-wings-810x/11574>\
**Category:** Foils and Boards - Gear Talk\
**Created:** [August 4, 2025, 7:38pm UTC](https://forum.progressionproject.com/t/new-code-surf-wings-810x/11574 "2025-08-04T19:38:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 82

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Matt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/a6a055/32.png) [@Matt](https://forum.progressionproject.com/u/Matt)\
**Post date:** [October 3, 2025, 8:30am UTC](https://forum.progressionproject.com/t/new-code-surf-wings-810x/11574/82 "2025-10-03T08:30:16Z")

</div>

Moving this here to keep it together.

> [@Prone Foiling Innovation - Anything going on?](https://forum.progressionproject.com/t/prone-foiling-innovation-anything-going-on/12167/38):
>
> Comparing AFS Silk 850 with Code 810x, I think the feeling is that these foils like to be pushed, and leave less margin for being ridden badly, but unlock good riding. It reminds me of a good surfboard.
> 
> The 810x is what I expected, it’s like a surfier version of the 850s. The breaches are extremely smooth. It’s very neutral and stable.
> 
> Easy enough to pump a few connections, grave digging is easier than the Silk 850. I prefer the Silk but I’ve really got it dialled in.
> 
> The 810x has less “return push” when you roll it over, which I had got used to on the Silk (some Silk 850 waves from [yesterday](https://www.youtube.com/shorts/m_0yS2qptyA)), so I think that might be the biggest learning.
> 
> 810x is neutral all the way, where the Silk 850 starts to linearly build roll pressure as you lean it over, that was the only thing I struggled with on the 810x.
> 
> 810x, Silk 850
> 
> ![CleanShot 2025-09-27 at 12.40.23](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/uploads/progressionproject/original/2X/b/b551aa5d1c8723cc313b25bfd4e66784489b9496.jpeg)
> 
> 810x, Silk 850
> 
> ![CleanShot 2025-09-27 at 12.40.34](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/uploads/progressionproject/original/2X/e/e7a0649fce95488d7bbc34bbf35d32ee8afbe134.jpeg)
> 
> 850s, 810x, Silk 850
> 
> ![CleanShot 2025-09-27 at 12.40.04](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex030/uploads/progressionproject/original/2X/8/8291fc8f005c45c2c7ab4f354582d8e363e0ecbc.jpeg)

Now a few more sessions in, from knee high to overhead, all beach break prone ([here](https://www.surfline.com/surf-report/bude-summerleaze/5a282eb11d8788001b7967a1?camId=5a21a1fbf20eb500195b40c5&currentTimestamp=1759167656246&pageSection=rewind&view=table) and [here](https://www.surfline.com/surf-report/bude-summerleaze/5a282eb11d8788001b7967a1?camId=5a21a1fbf20eb500195b40c5&currentTimestamp=1759214624611&pageSection=rewind&view=table) are surfline clips.

I think it’s great, I prefer the Silk, I don’t really want to as it would be easier to shift to Code as local buddy is on Code and the Code R are super easy for DW.

I think it comes down to one thing:

> The 810x has less “return push” when you roll it over, it’s neutral all the way, where the Silk 850 starts to linearly build roll pressure as you lean it over.

(I have zero affiliation, pay retail and am [intermediate](https://www.youtube.com/shorts/m_0yS2qptyA))

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.progressionproject.com/t/new-code-surf-wings-810x/11574)._