Will there be an 80cm RC mast? Also, any plans for a 900 Orca?
1 Like
How exactly are you doing these checks? I’m impressed you can dial it from a static test, I’ve always used similar as a starting point.
Hi,
yes, we’re are working on both - 80cm masts and 900 orca… not sure on availability, however should know more next week…
You can get an idea of balance by lifting up the board with the front wing and checking to see if it hangs nose up or down. This can help dial in the spot to put the mast.
Br,
Chris
2 Likes
I had previously dialed in the Code 2 years ago on my board. Hanging balance test, then ride and confirm. So when I got the F4, I did quick hang test, by eye, no measurements and rode it. The ride felt off. So put the Code back on my board, in the marked spot in the tracks. Took precise measurements of nose and tail to floor, then duplicated those dimensions with the F4 mounted. That got me the 16mm reward number and spot on ride.
My method is 2x4 clamped to shop table, with overhang. Allows front wing to hang point to point on corner edge of 2x4. It does not slip off 2x4.
Any details on the Tuttle mast release dates and thickness, rc vs ax. Looks like ax. Excited to try. Got the Emona and absolutely love it
I’ve hear rumours that there is a production run planned for this month.
Details about the dimensions and stiffness compared to AX and RC I don’t have yet, but will for sure report as soon as I have a mast in my hands.
900 Orca + tuttle mast sounds right up my alley!
If I was starting my gear closet from scratch I would go for a Manta setup on tuttle mast paired with that sexy new Slingshot/KenAdgate tuttle board…
5 Likes
Hi,
The 82.5cm Tuttle mast are in transit and should be here in a couple weeks! There is an unbelievable video of Kenny carving down the Maliko run on it. Not sure I’ve seen anyone ride downwind like that!! Will ask Cynthia if we can post it…
Br,
Chris
3 Likes
Chris, are you changing the way you measure mast length? The new 82.5cm Tuttle, plus knowing my 85cm RC with base plate, is actually 87.5cm measured the Code way, raises this question in my mind. I want a 80cm RC base plate mast, because I expect it be 82.5cm actual, measured the Code way. Not saying either way is the right way, just want to buy the right mast when switching from Code, where I was dialed.
Hi,
Thanks for the message!! We always measure the mast from the bottom of the board to the top of the fuselage. Since fuselages can vary in thickness, this is the most consistent way to measure mast length. All our masts are measured like this! Apologies for any confusion as I’m not sure how anyone else does it!
Br,
Chris
Seems like the best way to measure mast length for sure! Measuring to include the fuse depth is adding in extra length that you don’t actually have to play with when foiling (unless you are Cash Berzola)
Here is a good visual reference. Code 1130s nose to nose with 1050 Orca. Both 85cm masts. You can see why I’m hot to get the 80cm RC when available.
Hi,
Yes agreed for sure! We should probably include some details in the specs, it’s the standard for the race foils, but everyone needs to know what they are getting. Longer isn’t better in all cases! At least for masts.
br,
Chris
honestly, I don’t think you should need to clarify that. Your measurement is intuitive & logical.
Measuring to the bottom of the fuselage insertion point is totally arbitrary, weird, and probably is the one that needs the asterisk explanation.
Disagree. The more informed people are, the better.
2 Likes
fair point.
One more for the wish list. A 15mm mast for 1250 and 1050 Orca. I might chop my 1050 Orca to a span that works better with 13mm mast, until the 900 Orca is released. I’m thinking the 900 Orca will be the max span that works “for me” with a 13mm mast.
This is a very interesting opinion to me, I’d love to hear a bit more detail. Is the 13mm mast lacking stiffness at the spans of the 1050 and 1250, in your experience? How does this manifest when riding?
Yes, not enough control over those spans. A bit too wobbly and sloppy control.