There’s been increasing discussion about the performance gains of a Tuttle connection vs. a track plate system for foiling.
In the beginning, 10 seasons ago, all there was were Tuttle Boxes compatible with GoFoil, then Naish…. I begrudgingly moved to the Tracks 5 years ago BUT:
Given Recent commentary from Ken Adgate, Kyle Touhey, and Edo Tanas among others, it’s worth laying out the case clearly.
The Performance Benefits
1) Increased Stiffness
With a Tuttle system, fibers run vertically through the head and into a high-density, carbon-wrapped cassette structure. Loads are transferred deck-to-deck, not just into a shallow skin laminate around tracks.
-
Vertical compression is better supported.
-
Lateral torsional loads are better contained.
-
The connection becomes structural, not just bolted-on hardware.
As Ken put it, we’re spending enormous money on ultra-stiff carbon masts — then bolting them to what is effectively a soft interface. That interface becomes the weakest link.
2) Lower Profile = Lower Drag
The large base plate is eliminated.
The mast head mates directly to the board’s bottom surface. That means:
-
Less paddle drag during takeoff
-
Cleaner water flow at low speeds
-
Lower overall stack height
It’s subtle — but high-performance riding is built on subtle differences.
3) Lower Weight
As Kane DeWilde noted:
“The heaviest part of the entire foil is that carbon fiber baseplate.”
Eliminating the plate can reduce total system weight by approximately 1–1.5 lbs. On high-performance boards where grams matter, that’s significant.
4) Increased Strength / Reduced Failure Risk
Similar to stiffness — but worth stating separately.
With a proper Tuttle cassette:
-
Compression loads are distributed vertically.
-
Tension loads are transmitted deeper into the structure.
-
There’s less localized crushing around track inserts.
Given how many track boxes fail under cyclic pumping loads, this is significant.
5) Lower Long-Term System Cost
Once standardized:
-
No need for heavy plate systems.
-
Mast and board integration becomes cleaner.
-
Less complicated track hardware.
The Downsides
A) Reduced Adjustability
Track systems offer near-infinite fore/aft adjustment.
Tuttle is fixed — though adjustable Tuttles with ±1” movement and rake shims are now emerging.
B) Compatibility & Industry Momentum
-
Only a few brands currently offer Tuttle mast bases.
-
Most board builders are fully committed to track construction.
